Sunday, March 28, 2010
Office 2.0 continued
Just a few words on ThinkFree as I am looking forward to eating lunch and curling up with a relaxing book (though probably not a Victorian novel!) It was interesting to be able to compare and contrast the functionality of Goggle Docs and ThinkFree Office. I disliked having to download additional software. Initially ThinkFree in slick presentation was apparently more sophisticated offering a Windows Word interface however, after checking the line speed which was apparently fine, I found the speed at which it was operating uncooperatively slow and this prohibited the inclination to further exploration at this point.
Office 2.0
The Easter break is approaching and I'm feeling exhausted; after a week a work and supervision in London on Thursday evening the critical faculties are some what limited. I fear this entry might be not be as fluent or thoughtful as usual.
The cloud computing is an exceptional development and has great potentiality. I would happily investigate the implications of the "cloud" further. I feel it is going to be revolutionary in the future, in the way we work and conceive of the ownership of our documents and applications. It raises technical and ethical issues which are only partially perceived at at present.
I feel the "cloud" is a useful too giving ease of accessibility from remote locations so long as a there is a computer and Internet connection. A particularly good use of Office 2.0 is perhaps when wishing to share a particularly large document with a colleague. Frequently, I have found that conventional email applications do not permit the transmission of large email attachments with complicated formatting. The cloud permits this operation to be performed. I wonder if the cloud will replace the ubiquitous USB device. The cloud provides for mass storage and back up and wonder how this will compete with the increasing storage capacity and cheapness of other devices. The introduction to this exercise mentions further advantages of cloud; that there is no longer a need for security patchs, updates and upgrades as this will be done in the cloud and, that compatibility is no longer an issue for collaborators. The cloud will contain our creatvity and this raises questions about the integrity of the creative endeavour what constitutes document and author!
I found Goggle Docs exceptionally easy to use. I was able to view a useful document from Lucile Desligneres. I found Google Docs exceptionaly easy to navigate. I discovered the online dictionary with links to Wikipedia and handy synonymns. The formating functions were limited but perhaps this an advantage when using Goggle Docs to share documents as tricksey formatting can make document unnnecessary difficult to read.I created a document in Google Documents to share with the 23 Things Team. I included a picture and link to wikipedia. I changed the colour and style of font to make it more attractive
I would certainly consider using Google Docs in a collaborative environment
PS I also experimented with the form!
The cloud computing is an exceptional development and has great potentiality. I would happily investigate the implications of the "cloud" further. I feel it is going to be revolutionary in the future, in the way we work and conceive of the ownership of our documents and applications. It raises technical and ethical issues which are only partially perceived at at present.
I feel the "cloud" is a useful too giving ease of accessibility from remote locations so long as a there is a computer and Internet connection. A particularly good use of Office 2.0 is perhaps when wishing to share a particularly large document with a colleague. Frequently, I have found that conventional email applications do not permit the transmission of large email attachments with complicated formatting. The cloud permits this operation to be performed. I wonder if the cloud will replace the ubiquitous USB device. The cloud provides for mass storage and back up and wonder how this will compete with the increasing storage capacity and cheapness of other devices. The introduction to this exercise mentions further advantages of cloud; that there is no longer a need for security patchs, updates and upgrades as this will be done in the cloud and, that compatibility is no longer an issue for collaborators. The cloud will contain our creatvity and this raises questions about the integrity of the creative endeavour what constitutes document and author!
I found Goggle Docs exceptionally easy to use. I was able to view a useful document from Lucile Desligneres. I found Google Docs exceptionaly easy to navigate. I discovered the online dictionary with links to Wikipedia and handy synonymns. The formating functions were limited but perhaps this an advantage when using Goggle Docs to share documents as tricksey formatting can make document unnnecessary difficult to read.I created a document in Google Documents to share with the 23 Things Team. I included a picture and link to wikipedia. I changed the colour and style of font to make it more attractive
I would certainly consider using Google Docs in a collaborative environment
PS I also experimented with the form!
Monday, March 22, 2010
Out of tune with bad taste Tweet
First bad experience of social networking
Find in email today the following. Find this rather disturbing and unpleasant piece of spam. No at all what I like. However have I have press the report amateur porn movies for spam. I feel confident that Twitter has now dealt with this. This feels more intrusive than the email spam spam of the same nature; more personal somehow! Is it because following and stalking are like activities. Really does highlight the issues of security, and personal safety when using the Internet and the affect on vulnerable individuals . Will have a look at preference and see if I can alter them to stop this happening again. Another reason for not liking Twitter
Find in email today the following. Find this rather disturbing and unpleasant piece of spam. No at all what I like. However have I have press the report amateur porn movies for spam. I feel confident that Twitter has now dealt with this. This feels more intrusive than the email spam spam of the same nature; more personal somehow! Is it because following and stalking are like activities. Really does highlight the issues of security, and personal safety when using the Internet and the affect on vulnerable individuals . Will have a look at preference and see if I can alter them to stop this happening again. Another reason for not liking Twitter
Hi, Martha Braithwaite.
Amateur Porn Movies (pornzddl) is now following your tweets on Twitter.
A little information about Amateur Porn Movies:
 | 252 followers 1748 tweets following 1266 people |
You may follow Amateur Porn Movies as well by clicking on the "follow" button on their profile.If you believe Amateur Porn Movies is engaging in abusive behavior on Twitter, you may report Amateur Porn Movies for spam.
Amateur Porn Movies may not appear in your follower list. Amateur Porn Movies may have decided to stop following you, or the account may have been suspended for a Terms of Service violation.
If you'd rather not receive follow notification emails from Twitter, you can unsubscribe immediately. To resubscribe or change other Twitter email preferences, visit your account settings to manage email notices. Please do not reply to this message; it was sent from an unmonitored email address. This message is a service email related to your use of Twitter. For general inquiries or to request support with your Twitter account, please visit us at Twitter Support.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
A failure of application to work and an introduction to Facebook Apps
Friday 19th - Estimates are out of the way and having negoitated a good deal with the Busar or he with me; I have also sorted out with Conference Manager whether the Library could offer support to a group of teachers planning an awayday, which sadly it can not, I am feeling relaxed. Fortunately, a colleague from another library passes by and, despite spending rather more gossiping (chattering - see my previous posts re: Twiiter) than I should, we finally get around to discussing 23 Things! Thanks to this informal networking (chatter) I have discovered how to add some apps to my potential library Facebook page and also how to create the page but necesary have it go instantly live. What a nice way to spend a rainy Friday afternoon!
Wicked Wikis ... the performance
I think Wikipedia is invaluable tool. Some of fellow librarians frown up Wikipedia and my colleagues at work wonder why a librarian should use it. Wikipedia is like any other information resource and should be used with the evaluative mindset that any good librarian or researcher should apply to any source, primary or secondary, that they use. I have used it to identify people; (Bryan Guiness), locate places, (the state of towns in the US), understand movements, (situationalism), and the thinking of groups (Rosicrucians).
I feel Wikipedia can be compared with the great Enlightenment project that was the Encyclopedie of D'Alembert and Diderot. Their goals are similar and yet unobtainable in collecting together all available knowledge. Wikipedia defines it policy on entries as engendering "civility". This is a very Enlightenment word. It also encompasses ideas about civilization and Wikipedia is an expression of our current civilisation.
Wikipedia is about collaboration, co-operation and community. This is rather like the eighteenth century bodies such as the Lunar Society, Royal Societies and philosophical societies of the Enlightenment project. It democratises information moving outside the elitism of the the university. This shares in the aspirations of Enlightenment and pushes the boundaries of knowledge further in the co-operation of academic and amateur. It values all information equally and nothing is neglected as unworthy of inclusion. Wikipedia also contributes to the globalisation of information. Some might suggest that Wikipedia is subject to bias but if you look carefully at the objective introduction of any encyclopedia you will identify their "subjective" ideological purpose.
What is also of value with Wikipedia is the added value of its entries; the ease of navigation through entries by hyperlinks, the quick facts panels, hyperlinks to references, the added external links many to reputable academic bodies, organisations and institutions, scholarly projects and established knowledgeable communities such as clubs and societies. The additional information is in many forms of media. The options to locate and purchase books is another useful feature.
I was glad to be able to investigate the prefatory material to Wikipedia, as with any use of dictionary or encyclopedia, this often neglected in the urgent need to find the essential information. I now feel I have to hand to answers to those who a critical of the use of the Wikipedia and better equipped to use the Wikipedia as an effective research tool.
The history and discussion tabs are useful for ascertaining the providence of articles and protect against misleading and inaccurate articles. Editing a page was very easy and here is my meagre contribution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Steele. Must remember to check if there in a couple of months.
I would like to understand further about the Portal projects within Wikipedia
I could write a whole article on Wikipedia but as time is short I will confine myself to the comments above. And perversely, I still feel that somehow I would be uneasy if I saw Wikipedia featured in scholarly bibliography!
I feel Wikipedia can be compared with the great Enlightenment project that was the Encyclopedie of D'Alembert and Diderot. Their goals are similar and yet unobtainable in collecting together all available knowledge. Wikipedia defines it policy on entries as engendering "civility". This is a very Enlightenment word. It also encompasses ideas about civilization and Wikipedia is an expression of our current civilisation.
Wikipedia is about collaboration, co-operation and community. This is rather like the eighteenth century bodies such as the Lunar Society, Royal Societies and philosophical societies of the Enlightenment project. It democratises information moving outside the elitism of the the university. This shares in the aspirations of Enlightenment and pushes the boundaries of knowledge further in the co-operation of academic and amateur. It values all information equally and nothing is neglected as unworthy of inclusion. Wikipedia also contributes to the globalisation of information. Some might suggest that Wikipedia is subject to bias but if you look carefully at the objective introduction of any encyclopedia you will identify their "subjective" ideological purpose.
What is also of value with Wikipedia is the added value of its entries; the ease of navigation through entries by hyperlinks, the quick facts panels, hyperlinks to references, the added external links many to reputable academic bodies, organisations and institutions, scholarly projects and established knowledgeable communities such as clubs and societies. The additional information is in many forms of media. The options to locate and purchase books is another useful feature.
I was glad to be able to investigate the prefatory material to Wikipedia, as with any use of dictionary or encyclopedia, this often neglected in the urgent need to find the essential information. I now feel I have to hand to answers to those who a critical of the use of the Wikipedia and better equipped to use the Wikipedia as an effective research tool.
The history and discussion tabs are useful for ascertaining the providence of articles and protect against misleading and inaccurate articles. Editing a page was very easy and here is my meagre contribution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Steele. Must remember to check if there in a couple of months.
I would like to understand further about the Portal projects within Wikipedia
I could write a whole article on Wikipedia but as time is short I will confine myself to the comments above. And perversely, I still feel that somehow I would be uneasy if I saw Wikipedia featured in scholarly bibliography!
Conference Tweets
Although not liking Twitter I was able to follow the Oxford Librarians's Staff Conference via #olc10 whilst working hard on chapter of thesis!
Wicked Wikis ... behind the stage curtain
This week's first exercise was useful in allowing one to get behind the stage curtain of the wiki and see behind the scenes. First there was the all important question of the name of the drama "wiki" means "quick" and not "what I know is" or as Wikipedia puts it "wiki has being by some backronymed as what I know is.
Through an error I made when adding more pages then I intended, I discovered that wikis do not necessary have to be vast unconglomerated mass of spurious information but a mediated and controlled environment consisting of specific information for a individual community; in this case Oxford web 2.0 librarians. This suggests to me that the wiki might be an especially useful way of providing a "desk manual" or "FAQ" site for use many professions; outlining practices and procedures, or for quick reference at library issue desk, lodge reception, or in another similar situation.
Having been frustrated with my initial inability to add a page and then succeeding to add rather more then required by the exercise I had little time or inclination to add much more. I did go OULS hunting. Here is my contribution http://tinyurl.com/ybwf4hr. I didn't spot many more; perhaps everyone has been assiduously changing them. Has anyone been keeping a record I wonder distractedly and is there a prize for the one who has changed the most!
This week's exercise also allowed me to tick of a job from my long to do list where it had been lingering since January, when I added LibraryThing to the small but now growing list of web applications supported by my Library but had not added to the Directory of Web 2.0 Resources
Wikis are are wicked
Through an error I made when adding more pages then I intended, I discovered that wikis do not necessary have to be vast unconglomerated mass of spurious information but a mediated and controlled environment consisting of specific information for a individual community; in this case Oxford web 2.0 librarians. This suggests to me that the wiki might be an especially useful way of providing a "desk manual" or "FAQ" site for use many professions; outlining practices and procedures, or for quick reference at library issue desk, lodge reception, or in another similar situation.
Having been frustrated with my initial inability to add a page and then succeeding to add rather more then required by the exercise I had little time or inclination to add much more. I did go OULS hunting. Here is my contribution http://tinyurl.com/ybwf4hr. I didn't spot many more; perhaps everyone has been assiduously changing them. Has anyone been keeping a record I wonder distractedly and is there a prize for the one who has changed the most!
This week's exercise also allowed me to tick of a job from my long to do list where it had been lingering since January, when I added LibraryThing to the small but now growing list of web applications supported by my Library but had not added to the Directory of Web 2.0 Resources
Wikis are are wicked
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Tweeting or chattering
My last post was more of my experiences with Twitter; I feel I have not written any thing reflective about "Twitter" as a tool for the dissemination of information or its effective use in the library environment. Finding Twitter difficult I have refrained until I had a clearer vision.
I think perhaps it is better used in a highly the mobile environment with a wireless phone or IPod or such like. In the fast moving environment of market information, legal judgments or latest test results from experiment where speed, accuracy and instaneous communication are of importance Twittter may be invaluable. However this seems lost to most of us.
It is regret I that it hard to see how Twitter can be an effective tool. Twitter seems to be an electronic form of chatter and as such I find it contains little information of importance, value or quality but plenty of quantity. As chatterer myself, I realise now that I should be more circumspect in my conversations and perhaps least said is better and what is said will have more impact. Ideally Twitter should be my ideal tool but it irritating and inane. Sorry!
I think perhaps it is better used in a highly the mobile environment with a wireless phone or IPod or such like. In the fast moving environment of market information, legal judgments or latest test results from experiment where speed, accuracy and instaneous communication are of importance Twittter may be invaluable. However this seems lost to most of us.
It is regret I that it hard to see how Twitter can be an effective tool. Twitter seems to be an electronic form of chatter and as such I find it contains little information of importance, value or quality but plenty of quantity. As chatterer myself, I realise now that I should be more circumspect in my conversations and perhaps least said is better and what is said will have more impact. Ideally Twitter should be my ideal tool but it irritating and inane. Sorry!
Saturday, March 13, 2010
(S)tweet reply
Fledgling that I am, I have attempted to tweet a reply to Jane's comment. I wonder whether it came to roost?
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
140 characters ... or a preference for the Dawn Chorus
Looking forward to learning about Twitter
Am I going to become an "actwivist"; I don't want to become a "twitterazzi" but wouldn't mind becoming a member of the "Twitterati" dispensing "Twisdom and falling prey to some "attwaction". I hoping to pay "atwention" and finally sign off with a "fly-bye". Or perhaps just I should just "detweet" now!
Being a wordy person 140 characters is going to be really difficult. At least I don't have to keep my blog entry to 140 characters
Biggest challenge yet ... the experience
Twitter has been my biggest challenge yet and it's just not a question of 140 characters.
Log on to Twitter easily. Filled in a bit of profile and changed the appearance a a bit.
A digression on personalisation ....
Have realised that the options to change the appearance of your page on social media sites aren't just there to be time consuming or work procrastinating, but to make what is an impersonal piece of software - well -personal; rather like putting a on stunning and individual piece of jewellry, a haut couture dress, or idiosyncratic leggings. It says me or do I mean you! However, in this case limited time meant limited me!
Back to the challenge ....
Looking at suggestions for who to follow I discover the same "popular" categories of the other social media we have looked at; "family", "fashion", "food and drink", "health", "sport" but also "business", "charities" and "politics". Decided to delve a bit further and find that "charities" are using twitter and although there is an American bias. I identify The Peace Corps, American Red Cross, UN Refugee Agency, Oxfam International, WWF and Unicef. Signing up to Oxfam I later receive a tweet job advert. How amazing is that! What an effective outreach tool.
"Health" throws up an eclectic mixture of authoritative bodies such as WHO, alternative health practitioners and, good number of health and beauty magazines. Again, there is an American bias.
"Politics" mixes up the The Economist with unheard of American politicians. Amazed to discover The British Monarchy tweets!
"Music" takes me into the danger zone of the celebrity and I quickly retreat.
Checkout tweepmlorg and wefollow.com. Search the websites discover which libraries tweet find the Bodleian doesn't nor the British Library but the National Library of Scotland does! They are also on Facebook Flickr and YouTube.
Next I have to start tweeting ...
I am nervous about starting a conversation but the follower of my blog seems a friendly kind of person so decide to tweet at them. Think, they get half a tweet, a tweet or even the same tweet twice!
Utterly confused by #ox23 until I find the search box on the right. Now I have found a whole community of confused or confident twitterers or do I mean tweeters? Love the tweets of Konnie Bunny and Co at the RSL. Laughter is better than a squawk of frustration!
Tried retweeting (RT) article on why women should be active partners in climate change. It shot off without the opportunity to explain why I thought this was important enough to RT. I have no idea who got it, if anyone. Found an interesting tweet from NLS on Scottish ballads and RT it from NLS website. This is more successful falling happy into the Twitter dialogue box, I was able to add a comment and press send. Checking "retweets by you" I feel confident that it was RTed. But who got it? Checking #ox23 find mention of Tweetdeck. Losing will to tweet.
Managed a direct tweet (DT) more by accident and then any expertise gained. Besides couldn't let "Other Half" get away with snide comments!
Got home and looked at Twitter again in order to write this blog entry. Finally worked out what @marthbraithwai was. I am so glad that I'm not the only one who isn't roosting with the rooks. I'm definitely a cuckoo in the tweeter's nest.
Am I going to become an "actwivist"; I don't want to become a "twitterazzi" but wouldn't mind becoming a member of the "Twitterati" dispensing "Twisdom and falling prey to some "attwaction". I hoping to pay "atwention" and finally sign off with a "fly-bye". Or perhaps just I should just "detweet" now!
Being a wordy person 140 characters is going to be really difficult. At least I don't have to keep my blog entry to 140 characters
Biggest challenge yet ... the experience
Twitter has been my biggest challenge yet and it's just not a question of 140 characters.
Log on to Twitter easily. Filled in a bit of profile and changed the appearance a a bit.
A digression on personalisation ....
Have realised that the options to change the appearance of your page on social media sites aren't just there to be time consuming or work procrastinating, but to make what is an impersonal piece of software - well -personal; rather like putting a on stunning and individual piece of jewellry, a haut couture dress, or idiosyncratic leggings. It says me or do I mean you! However, in this case limited time meant limited me!
Back to the challenge ....
Looking at suggestions for who to follow I discover the same "popular" categories of the other social media we have looked at; "family", "fashion", "food and drink", "health", "sport" but also "business", "charities" and "politics". Decided to delve a bit further and find that "charities" are using twitter and although there is an American bias. I identify The Peace Corps, American Red Cross, UN Refugee Agency, Oxfam International, WWF and Unicef. Signing up to Oxfam I later receive a tweet job advert. How amazing is that! What an effective outreach tool.
"Health" throws up an eclectic mixture of authoritative bodies such as WHO, alternative health practitioners and, good number of health and beauty magazines. Again, there is an American bias.
"Politics" mixes up the The Economist with unheard of American politicians. Amazed to discover The British Monarchy tweets!
"Music" takes me into the danger zone of the celebrity and I quickly retreat.
Checkout tweepmlorg and wefollow.com. Search the websites discover which libraries tweet find the Bodleian doesn't nor the British Library but the National Library of Scotland does! They are also on Facebook Flickr and YouTube.
Next I have to start tweeting ...
I am nervous about starting a conversation but the follower of my blog seems a friendly kind of person so decide to tweet at them. Think, they get half a tweet, a tweet or even the same tweet twice!
Utterly confused by #ox23 until I find the search box on the right. Now I have found a whole community of confused or confident twitterers or do I mean tweeters? Love the tweets of Konnie Bunny and Co at the RSL. Laughter is better than a squawk of frustration!
Tried retweeting (RT) article on why women should be active partners in climate change. It shot off without the opportunity to explain why I thought this was important enough to RT. I have no idea who got it, if anyone. Found an interesting tweet from NLS on Scottish ballads and RT it from NLS website. This is more successful falling happy into the Twitter dialogue box, I was able to add a comment and press send. Checking "retweets by you" I feel confident that it was RTed. But who got it? Checking #ox23 find mention of Tweetdeck. Losing will to tweet.
Managed a direct tweet (DT) more by accident and then any expertise gained. Besides couldn't let "Other Half" get away with snide comments!
Got home and looked at Twitter again in order to write this blog entry. Finally worked out what @marthbraithwai was. I am so glad that I'm not the only one who isn't roosting with the rooks. I'm definitely a cuckoo in the tweeter's nest.
Friday, March 5, 2010
Linked Into LinkedIn
I am flattered to discover that I already had a LinkedIn Account having brought invited by former students. A few more invitations were also awaiting my attention too. I updated my profile a little, added a few apps and joined the CILIP group.
There was an article in the "Jobs" section of the Guardian last weekend on the use of social networking sites and their use in in the world of work. I really meant to save to it, read it and use it to supplement the blog on Twitter and LinkedIn. However, it has gone for recycling and despite browsing the web for it I have not retrieved it.
I should perhaps browse the web for for some interesting articles however, I'm pushed for time; needing to return my books to the EFL, attend an openday on Community Led Planning (CLP), finish a chapter of the PhD (long term project but chapter is taking longer than it should. I blame 23 Things!), mow lawn, spoil cat and pamper husband!
There was an article in the "Jobs" section of the Guardian last weekend on the use of social networking sites and their use in in the world of work. I really meant to save to it, read it and use it to supplement the blog on Twitter and LinkedIn. However, it has gone for recycling and despite browsing the web for it I have not retrieved it.
I should perhaps browse the web for for some interesting articles however, I'm pushed for time; needing to return my books to the EFL, attend an openday on Community Led Planning (CLP), finish a chapter of the PhD (long term project but chapter is taking longer than it should. I blame 23 Things!), mow lawn, spoil cat and pamper husband!
Feeling unsocial about social networking!
This exercise immediately posed questions for further thought if not blogging! To be honest I had not really considered the variety of social networking sites and their different functionality. Thank you 23 things for making me aware of this. This exercise also made me challenge some of my prejudices and, pejorative ones at that, about Facebook. I had not even bothered to look at MySpace, or Bebo and I hadn't heard of Orkut. I have joined by invitation the LinkedIn pages of others so this exercise (13) and the following one (14) is both a challenge and a useful exploration of social networking.
From the Web 2.0 directory I linked to a number of libraries using Facebook pages. There are a variety of them, large institutional libraries and smaller faculty libraries and colleges too. This gave a good opportunity to see which libraries had used which functionality to what degree. Like everything in Oxford everybody does virtually (and literally virtually in this case!) much the same thing but in subtly different ways.
The best example of the useful of Facebook for this exercise I found to be the Education Library.
As well as providing genuine social network there was the appropriate amount of useful information clearly displayed. "The Wall provides for a genuine communication between readers with short sensible posting, comments and prompt and helpful replies. I felt that the wall used in this way promoted a sustained dialogue between reader and library, that probably does reflect, to a certain extent, the face to face conversation at the door. "The Info" tab was short and sweet providing the bare minimum but with links to more detailed information. I confess I think I would have liked to have seen more here. The "Info tab appears to be a good space for posting of genuine information: not gossip, not pictures and not ephemeral news. I find the "Boxes" tab a bit of misnomer but it seems to be used effectively by many libraries to provide links to external services with attractive logos and search boxes. I good way of collecting to together and promoting resources. The "Events" tab is useful for promoting events hosted by the library such as booksales and user-education sessions. It might also be useful for promoting other related events with caution. It clearly marks an event out as distinct piece of information about an individual one off event rather than mixing it up with general news where it might got lost. The "discussion" tab I thought would offer to engage people and promote a longer dialogue and space to talk about interesting things. Sadly, in the sites I looked at despite a thread being started there was little or no further engagement. I wonder how this might be used effectively to create a convivial conversation if not heated debate! The "links" tabs was useful for providing links. I wonder how this might relate to the use of "Delicious".
There is potentially for Facebook but there is a confusion between whether it genuinely "social" or "informational" or something inbetween; a good chimera or bad depending on content. It is difficult to see who takes "ownership" whether is reader or library or both to create a community and conversation. I found a certain circularity of information provision between Facebook, Blog, Twitter and Webpage. I suspect that as information sources we need to consider audience, content and functionality more coherently.
From the Web 2.0 directory I linked to a number of libraries using Facebook pages. There are a variety of them, large institutional libraries and smaller faculty libraries and colleges too. This gave a good opportunity to see which libraries had used which functionality to what degree. Like everything in Oxford everybody does virtually (and literally virtually in this case!) much the same thing but in subtly different ways.
The best example of the useful of Facebook for this exercise I found to be the Education Library.
As well as providing genuine social network there was the appropriate amount of useful information clearly displayed. "The Wall provides for a genuine communication between readers with short sensible posting, comments and prompt and helpful replies. I felt that the wall used in this way promoted a sustained dialogue between reader and library, that probably does reflect, to a certain extent, the face to face conversation at the door. "The Info" tab was short and sweet providing the bare minimum but with links to more detailed information. I confess I think I would have liked to have seen more here. The "Info tab appears to be a good space for posting of genuine information: not gossip, not pictures and not ephemeral news. I find the "Boxes" tab a bit of misnomer but it seems to be used effectively by many libraries to provide links to external services with attractive logos and search boxes. I good way of collecting to together and promoting resources. The "Events" tab is useful for promoting events hosted by the library such as booksales and user-education sessions. It might also be useful for promoting other related events with caution. It clearly marks an event out as distinct piece of information about an individual one off event rather than mixing it up with general news where it might got lost. The "discussion" tab I thought would offer to engage people and promote a longer dialogue and space to talk about interesting things. Sadly, in the sites I looked at despite a thread being started there was little or no further engagement. I wonder how this might be used effectively to create a convivial conversation if not heated debate! The "links" tabs was useful for providing links. I wonder how this might relate to the use of "Delicious".
There is potentially for Facebook but there is a confusion between whether it genuinely "social" or "informational" or something inbetween; a good chimera or bad depending on content. It is difficult to see who takes "ownership" whether is reader or library or both to create a community and conversation. I found a certain circularity of information provision between Facebook, Blog, Twitter and Webpage. I suspect that as information sources we need to consider audience, content and functionality more coherently.
Learning about Blogs has been really useful
http://radley.blogs.com/radley_parish_plan_2010/
Learning about blogs has been really very useful. I sit on our Parish Plan Steering Committee and we were looking at ways to increase participation and stimulate interest in the Plan. The Village Website run by volunteers leaves a bit to be desired. Yesterday afternoon with the help of Ian of Radley College, who allow us to use their server, we set up aRadleyParish Plan Blog! It will feed direct to the website so it will always be current update and interactive. As a consequence of 23 Things at least I knew about these things. I fear however as a "knowledgeable" person it's going to be me looking after it from now on!
The setting up the Radley Village Plan Blog was interesting as it uses TypePad rather than Blogger and I was able to to compare and contrast features of the blogging software. I found Blogger initially easier to get started and manipulate but TypePad has some attrative features; an option to set when a post appears on the blog, the facility to keep a particualar post at the head of a blog, and the ability to split an extended entry so that a long post doesn't push all the others into the background. The latter functionallity I think I have found on Blogger. I think it is propably Sit Feed tab > Allow Blog Feeds > Full/Short. I have not tried it out just in case it isn't and my entries are irretreviably shortened.
I am now interested in looking at other blogging sofware such as WordPress to see how that does things!
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Google, Pincic and Flickr
Thought I would add Laura's news to my Blog. It seems a good place to save this information so I can come back later if need and see what effect if any has on the efficacy of these resources.
Tuesday, March 02, 2010
Mar 02
News: Picnik has been acquired by Google
Labels: images, picnik, Week 7 Posted by Laura J. Wilkinson
In the news today: Google has acquired Picnik. I think this will be good news for Picnik: with the resources of Google behind them, they will be able to really develop their product (at the moment they only have 20 employees!).
It is not clear yet what impact this will have on the relationship between Picnik and Flickr (see Thing 8). The people at Picnik are very excited by this new development!
Note: this is not a 'Thing', just a news story which might interest you.
Tuesday, March 02, 2010
Mar 02
News: Picnik has been acquired by Google
Labels: images, picnik, Week 7 Posted by Laura J. Wilkinson
In the news today: Google has acquired Picnik. I think this will be good news for Picnik: with the resources of Google behind them, they will be able to really develop their product (at the moment they only have 20 employees!).
It is not clear yet what impact this will have on the relationship between Picnik and Flickr (see Thing 8). The people at Picnik are very excited by this new development!
Note: this is not a 'Thing', just a news story which might interest you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
